A complete psychological portrait — your developmental roots, core patterns, attachment style, and the precise belief system running underneath your decisions. Mapped across seven life domains. Built entirely from your answers.
The productivity industry won't tell you this: every habit stack, morning routine, and goal-setting framework was built with one invisible assumption — that you have a stable, unified self ready to execute it. Most people don't. What you have instead is a set of internal programs, installed at different points in your life, running simultaneously and cancelling each other out before any behaviour can compound.
AXIS draws from the most rigorously evidenced frameworks in psychological science — synthesised into a single portrait that is specific to you, not a category.
These frameworks are used not as competing lenses but as complementary instruments — each illuminating a different layer of the same portrait. The result is a document that is simultaneously precise enough to surprise and complete enough to be used.
I started therapy at 18. I'm 32 now. Across those fourteen years I tried CBT, hypnosis, somatic work, and psychedelic-assisted integration. Different therapists, different approaches, and somewhere along the way I noticed the same thing: I could understand my patterns in detail and still not change them. Self-awareness on its own didn't move the needle.
What did was structure. Specific frameworks held alongside each other — Jung, Adler, attachment theory, parts work, the cognitive and the somatic — applied to my actual life over years. AXIS is the instrument I built to organise that work, first for myself. The 92 questions are a distillation of what mattered. The document is what I wish someone had handed me at 23.
I don't have a clinical credential. I'm not pretending to. For years I've been the person friends come to with the things that aren't easy to talk about — the stuck patterns, the questions they can't take anywhere else. They're the reason AXIS exists. They kept pushing me to share what I'd been doing informally with them. If you've already tried the obvious things — therapy, coaching, books — and you're still circling the same patterns, this is the piece that was missing for me.
The questionnaire covers seven life domains across 92 questions. It asks uncomfortable things and waits for the honest answer. The document that comes back is specific enough that most clients describe it as their first fully accurate account of themselves.
For those who go further: twelve sessions with a coach who has studied your portrait before you speak.
Representative questions from the intake. The instrument is the actual product — the document is what it produces. If a question can be answered with the polished version, it has been rewritten until it can't be.
The remaining eighty-six questions cross seven psychological domains — career, money, health, relationships, family, psychology, identity — plus a closing reflection. The intake takes 60–90 minutes alone, uninterrupted. Voice dictation is supported. Pause and resume any time.
From free tools to full support — four ways into AXIS, depending on where you are and how deep you want to go.
Complete the diagnostic, follow the first 30 days, and if you don't feel you have more clarity about yourself than you did before — full refund, no questions asked. You keep the diagnostic report regardless.
Anything not answered here — ask directly when you apply.
Therapy typically focuses on processing the past. Conventional coaching focuses on goals and accountability. AXIS produces a precise diagnostic portrait — where your patterns come from, how they operate now, and what would have to change for the next chapter to be different. It is a map. What you do with the map is the work.
AXIS works best for people with a degree of self-awareness who are willing to be honest in the questionnaire. Its strongest results have come with high-performing professionals who feel stuck despite external success, people at genuine crossroads, and individuals who found previous coaching or therapy too generic. It is not a good fit for people in acute crisis.
Approximately 15–20 pages: developmental roots, three core limiting beliefs with protective functions, behavioural pattern analysis, domain scores across seven areas, a core wound map, attachment profile, genuine strengths, the central paradox, coaching hypothesis, infrastructure assessment, a 3-month plan with monthly tasks and daily practice, resistance points with self-directed questions, and a trajectory forecast for two paths. Everything is specific to your answers.
This is the right question. Every observation is traceable to something specific you said in the questionnaire. The methodology is built to prevent generalisation — if a detail is absent, the document notes the gap rather than filling it plausibly. The sample documents on this page are the clearest demonstration of what specificity looks like in practice.
Yes — the Diagnostic is a complete product in its own right. It includes a full 3-month plan built specifically for you. Many clients use it as a standalone. The coaching programme is for those who want to go deeper. Most clients who progress to the full programme start with the Diagnostic first.
You can ask an LLM to give you a Jungian read on your journal. The output looks plausible. What it misses: holding two frameworks in tension without flattening either, refusing to fill gaps when your answers are vague, and distinguishing a defence mechanism from the thing it is defending. The 92-question instrument is the actual product. The frameworks are not a prompt — they are how the questions are asked. The document is what that produces. If you can replicate the instrument and the synthesis with a prompt, you do not need this.
The questionnaire takes 60–90 minutes. Set aside the time to do it properly. What you put in is what you receive back.